So, i bought these shoes

pezcore · Post by **pezcore** » Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:30 am

Gay or Nay

http://www.reebokstore.co.uk/sl/reebok/ ... l-gum.html

-pez

shadowrage · Post by **shadowrage** » Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:33 am

they look fine to me pez.

hachi · Post by **hachi** » Fri Dec 08, 2006 9:52 am

I fear your shoes may be attracted to other men's shoes.

jk, I vote "nay"

Desari · Post by **Desari** » Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:40 pm

I have to say Gay as well. Too much colour blending. The tan/ecru/brown (or, better described by Reebok as being "Gold Umber") killed the style. Had it been gray, no matter what shade, then I'd say Nay. Suffice it to say, the style's great, the colour combination just kills it for me.

adonshae · Post by **adonshae** » Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:58 pm

I concur with Desari on this. The shoe's design is solid, but it looks like they need to be marketed to the color blind.

Preest · Post by **Preest** » Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:13 pm

Not just gay, flaming

Junniper · Post by **Junniper** » Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:14 pm

The white makes them a little hard to look at.

However I have nothing against baby blue / brown color combinations.

Not gay.

Kalverin · Post by **Kalverin** » Fri Dec 08, 2006 10:32 pm

They weren't gay until you put them on Pez.

Damn! I can't belive I came so late to this thread and no one had used that line yet. You guys are slacking.

Colors are fine, but the bright blue needs to be changed to...pretty much anything else.

Warthog · Post by **Warthog** » Wed Dec 13, 2006 6:04 pm

Definately on the sexually confused side. Maybe metro.