wow movie?

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:) :o :D ;) :p :mad: :confused: :( :rolleyes: :cool: :eek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: wow movie?

by Daiji » Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:01 pm

Atelo, Sam Raimi publicly appologized for Spiderman 3, he said the studio took too much creative control from him and changed the movie out from underneath him.

by godpigeon » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:15 pm

Atelo wrote:I found Spiderman 3 way too crammed, they tried to fit too much into the 2 hour time frame. 3 villains in one movie? Too much. Don't know if that's the script he wrote or if the director / producer butchered it. Hopefully they won't try to cram that much into a Warcraft movie.
Actually from some stories it was the "suits" that stepped in and pushed the 3 villain setup.

by ascanius » Thu Jul 23, 2009 6:02 pm

I will see a WoW movie when instead of handing out 3d glasses, they offer happy ending hand massages. And no, the retards they use to rip stubs and sweep aisles shouldn't be exploited for this purpose; nor should the establishment choose what gender the 'masseuse' is. The problem with this is that my only reason for being there would be the happy ending, and I have personal issues with paying for sexual gratification. So ultimately, even with the promise of hand jobs, I wouldn't go.
At this point my only recourse for hand jobs in the theater is to convince my girlfriend I don't want to see a movie that she desperately wants to, and only relent in my objections when manual favors are mentioned as payment for debts owed.

Oh, and see '500 Days of Summer' if you get the chance. I normally avoid romantic comedies, but certain offerings were made to appease me and I ultimately enjoyed the film. It's plot and acting were more than decent; the humor was fresh. The soundtrack alone makes the movie bearable.

by shadowrage » Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:34 pm

I want anti to make a movie now. :P

by Phire » Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:24 am

Antilikos wrote:Arthas?

The role of plague (capitalism) exposed villagers needing to be ganked will by played by anyone making over $250k a year.
Haha. Too funny Anti!

by Antilikos » Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:11 am

Arthas?

The role of plague (capitalism) exposed villagers needing to be ganked will by played by anyone making over $250k a year.
Attachments
Obama.jpg

by Bees » Wed Jul 22, 2009 8:42 am

it'll suck. i'll go see it anyway

hope there's a special edition pet given to everyone who sees it :D

by xion » Wed Jul 22, 2009 8:39 am

it def has alot of potential for fail...life action fantasy prolly won't work. if they did a cgi movie (advent children) its would be much for likely to not suck. but we all know i will see it no matter what and i do hope is isn't going to be as bad as we all think its going to be...but like i said i see a lil possiblity to be decent but not much hope.

by Atelo » Wed Jul 22, 2009 8:38 am

I found Spiderman 3 way too crammed, they tried to fit too much into the 2 hour time frame. 3 villains in one movie? Too much. Don't know if that's the script he wrote or if the director / producer butchered it. Hopefully they won't try to cram that much into a Warcraft movie.

by Daiji » Wed Jul 22, 2009 8:30 am

I am more saddened by Sam Raimi taking on the directors role. I really like his work, but this is only going to end badly I am afraid.

At least its not Uwe Boll (sp?)

Top