Which is why we need to just start killing 'unsafe' people rather than controlling the spread of weapons. I mean, how could an easily concealed submachine gun ever be cause for concern in an age of unconventional warfare and terrorism?
ascanius wrote:Which is why we need to just start killing 'unsafe' people rather than controlling the spread of weapons. I mean, how could an easily concealed submachine gun ever be cause for concern in an age of unconventional warfare and terrorism?
I would like to be in charge of deciding who is safe and who isn't, a few extras might get wiped out along the way but I think people would be willing to look the other way.
ascanius wrote:Which is why we need to just start killing 'unsafe' people rather than controlling the spread of weapons. I mean, how could an easily concealed submachine gun ever be cause for concern in an age of unconventional warfare and terrorism?
That is quite a step you took there Ascan. From clumsy fingers to urban warfare. You must be just itching for a debate.
Phire wrote:That is quite a step you took there Ascan. From clumsy fingers to urban warfare. You must be just itching for a debate.
I have to be honest, I didn't read the entire conversation; only the initial and last post. So you're in the right to chide me for posting an inflammatory response.